Reserves & Resources
Measured and Indicated
As of December 31, 2023
(100% basis)
(tonnes in thousands; pounds in millions; totals may not add up due to rounding)
| Measured | Indicated | Total Measured and Indicated | |||||
| Property | Tonnes | Grade | Content | Tonnes | Grade | Content | Content | Cameco's Share |
| Cigar Lake | 86.3 | 5.32 | 10.1 | 143.6 | 5.33 | 16.9 | 27.0 | 14.7 |
| Kintyre | 3,897.7 | 0.62 | 53.5 | 53.5 | 53.5 | |||
| McArthur River | 78.7 | 2.27 | 3.9 | 60.6 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 4.9 |
| Millenium |
|
|
| 1,442.6 | 2.39 | 75.9 | 75.9 | 53.0 |
| Rabbit Lake |
|
|
| 1,836.5 | 0.95 | 38.6 | 38.6 | 38.6 |
| Tamarack |
|
|
| 183.8 | 4.42 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 10.3 |
| Yeelirrie | 27,172.9 | 0.16 | 95.9 | 12,178.3 | 0.12 | 32.2 | 128.1 | 128.1 |
| Crow Butte | 1,558.1 | 0.19 | 6.6 | 939.3 | 0.35 | 7.3 | 13.9 | 13.9 |
| Gas Hills-Peach | 687.2 | 0.11 | 1.7 | 3,626.1 | 0.15 | 11.6 | 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Inkai | 87,192.7 | 0.03 | 56.1 | 65,236.0 | 0.02 | 32.9 | 89.1 | 35.6 |
| North Butte-Brown Ranch | 604.2 | 0.08 | 1.1 | 5,530.3 | 0.07 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Ruby Ranch |
|
|
| 2,215.3 | 0.08 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Shirley Basin | 89.2 | 0.16 | 0.3 | 1,638.2 | 0.11 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Smith Ranch-Highland | 3,703.5 | 0.10 | 7.9 | 14,372.3 | 0.05 | 17.0 | 24.9 | 24.9 |
| Total | 121,172.8 | – | 183.7 | 113,300.7 | – | 323.4 | 507.1 | 408.8 |
Note that mineral resources:
- do not include amounts that have been identified as mineral reserves
- do not have a demonstrated economic viability
- totals may not add due to rounding
Inferred
As of December 31, 2023
(100% basis)
(tonnes in thousands; pounds in millions, totals may not add up due to rounding)
| Property | Tonnes | Grade | Content | Cameco's Share |
| Cigar Lake | 163.4 | 5.55 | 20.0 | 10.9 |
| Fox Lake | 386.7 | 7.99 | 68.1 | 53.3 |
| Kintyre | 517.1 | 0.53 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| McArthur River | 517.1 | 0.53 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Millenium | 412.4 | 3.19 | 29.0 | 20.2 |
| Rabbit Lake | 2,460.9 | 0.62 | 33.7 | 33.7 |
| Tamarack | 45.6 | 1.02 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Crow Butte | 531.4 | 0.16 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Gas Hills-Peach | 3,307.5 | 0.08 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Inkai | 36,165.2 | 0.03 | 23.9 | 9.6 |
| North Butte-Brown Ranch | 294.5 | 0.07 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Ruby Ranch | 56.2 | 0.14 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Shirley Basin | 508.0 | 0.10 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Smith Ranch-Highland | 6,861.0 | 0.05 | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Total | 51,747.1 | – | 201.3 | 153.2 |
Note that mineral resources:
- do not include amounts that have been identified as mineral reserves
- do not have a demonstrated economic viability
- totals may not add due to rounding
Mineral Reserves and Resources
Our mineral reserves and resources are the foundation of our company and fundamental to our success.
We have interests in a number of uranium properties. The tables in this section show the estimates of the proven and probable mineral reserves, and measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources at those properties. However, only three of the properties listed in those tables are material uranium properties for us: McArthur River/Key Lake, Cigar Lake and Inkai. Mineral reserves and resources are all reported as of December 31, 2023.
We estimate and disclose mineral reserves and resources in five categories, using the definition standards adopted by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Council, and in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101), developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators. You can find out more about these categories at www.cim.org.
- About mineral resources
Mineral resources do not have to demonstrate economic viability but have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. They fall into three categories: measured, indicated and inferred. Our reported mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves.
- measured and indicated mineral resources can be estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the appropriate application of technical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors to support evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
- measured resources: we can confirm both geological and grade continuity to support detailed mine planning
- indicated resources: we can reasonably assume geological and grade continuity to support mine planning
- inferred mineral resources are estimated using limited geological evidence and sampling information. We do not have enough confidence to evaluate their economic viability in a meaningful way. You should not assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral resource, but it is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.
Our share of uranium in the following mineral resource tables is based on our respective ownership interests. Reported mineral resources have not demonstrated economic viability.
- measured and indicated mineral resources can be estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the appropriate application of technical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors to support evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
- About mineral reserves
Mineral reserves are the economically mineable part of measured and/or indicated mineral resources demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. The reference point at which mineral reserves are defined is the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant, except for ISR operations where the reference point is where the mineralization occurs under the existing or planned wellfield patterns. Mineral reserves fall into two categories:
- proven reserves: the economically mineable part of a measured resource for which at least a preliminary feasibility study demonstrates that, at the time of reporting, economic extraction could be reasonably justified with a high degree of confidence
- probable reserves: the economically mineable part of a measured and/or indicated resource for which at least a preliminary feasibility study demonstrates that, at the time of reporting, economic extraction could be reasonably justified with a degree of confidence lower than that applying to proven reserves
We use current geological models, an average uranium price of $54 (US) per pound U3O8, and current or projected operating costs and mine plans to report our mineral reserves, allowing for dilution and mining losses. We apply our standard data verification process for every estimate. For properties in which Cameco has an interest but is not the operator, we will take reasonable steps to ensure that the reserve and resource estimates that we report are reliable.
Our share of uranium in the mineral reserves table below is based on our respective ownership interests.
- Changes this year
- Image
Our share of proven and probable mineral reserves increased from 469 million pounds U3O8 at the end of 2022, to 485 million pounds at the end of 2023. The change was primarily the result of:
- mineral resource estimate update at Cigar Lake Extension and subsequent conversion of indicated mineral resources adding 40 million pounds to probable reserves.
partially offset by:
- production at Cigar Lake, Inkai and McArthur River, which removed 22 million pounds proven and probable reserves from our mineral inventory
The remaining changes are attributable to other adjustments based on the mineral resource and reserve estimate updates at Cigar Lake, McArthur River and Inkai.
Our share of measured and indicated mineral resources decreased from 451 million pounds U3O8 at the end of 2022, to 409 million pounds at the end of 2023. Our share of inferred mineral resources decreased from 154 million pounds U3O8. to 153 million pounds.
- Qualified persons
The technical and scientific information discussed in this MD&A for our material properties (McArthur River/Key Lake, Cigar Lake and Inkai) was approved by the following individuals who are qualified persons for the purposes of NI 43-101:
McArthur River/Key Lake
- Greg Murdock, general manager, McArthur River, Cameco
- Daley McIntyre, general manager, Key Lake, Cameco
- Alain D. Renaud, principal resource geologist, technical services, Cameco
- Biman Bharadwaj, principal metallurgist, technical services, Cameco
Cigar Lake
- Lloyd Rowson, general manager, /Cigar Lake, Cameco
- Scott Bishop, director, technical services, Cameco
- Alain D. Renaud, principal resource geologist, technical services, Cameco
- Biman Bharadwaj, principal metallurgist, technical services, Cameco
Inkai
- Alain D. Renaud, principal resource geologist, technical services, Cameco
- Scott Bishop, director, technical services, Cameco
- Biman Bharadwaj, principal metallurgist, technical services, Cameco
- Sergey Ivanov, deputy director general, technical services, Cameco Kazakhstan LLP
- Important information about mineral reserve and resource estimates
Although we have carefully prepared and verified the mineral reserve and resource figures in this document, the figures are estimates, based in part on forward-looking information.
Estimates are based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results, the quality of available data and management’s best judgment. They are, however, imprecise by nature, may change over time, and include many variables and assumptions, including:
- geological interpretation
- extraction plans
- commodity prices and currency exchange rates
- recovery rates
- operating and capital costs
There is no assurance that the indicated levels of uranium will be produced, and we may have to re-estimate our mineral reserves based on actual production experience. Changes in the price of uranium, production costs or recovery rates could make it unprofitable for us to operate or develop a particular site or sites for a period of time. See page 2 of our 2023 Q4 MD&A for information about forward-looking information.
Please see our mineral reserves and resources section of our annual information form for the specific assumptions, parameters and methods used for McArthur River, Inkai and Cigar Lake mineral reserve and resource estimates.
- Important information for US investors
We present information about mineralization, mineral reserves and resources as required by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (NI 43-101), in accordance with applicable Canadian securities laws. As a foreign private issuer filing reports with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Multijurisdictional Disclosure System, we are not required to comply with the SEC’s disclosure requirements relating to mining properties. Investors in the United States should be aware that the disclosure requirements of NI 43-101 are different from those under applicable SEC rules, and the information that we present concerning mineralization, mineral reserves and resources may not be comparable to information made public by companies that comply with the SEC’s reporting and disclosure requirements for mining companies.