Environment & Safety

Image
Three people wearing hard hats with lights walking through tunnel
In June 2021, Cigar Lake Mine celebrated its fourth consecutive win of the John T. Ryan Regional Safety Trophy.

Safety

We manage the safety of our workers through programs, systems, and standards, with our Safety, Health, Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Policy providing overarching guidance. There are many aspects of the management system that contribute to a safe work environment, a few examples include:

  • Risk assessments help identify issues and determine the appropriate controls; the corrective action process verifies that incidents and near misses are reported, tracked, investigated and shared with colleagues; and emergency preparedness and planning prepare us to respond to serious incidents.
  • We have developed 12 corporate safety standards to help protect our workers from our most common hazards. Some standards guide our general safety practices, such as our job hazard analysis and our job task observation, and other standards deal with specific hazardous situations (similar to other companies’ life saving rules): such as fall protection, confined space entry, rigging and hoisting, and control of hazardous energy (also referred to as lockout/tagout).
  • Routine audits are conducted to monitor compliance with regulations and our own requirements. These and other aspects of the management system are routinely examined to verify that they continue to be effective at keeping our workers safe.

Recognized for four consecutive years by the Canadian Institute of Mining's John T. Ryan Regional Safety Trophy, Cigar Lake's risk-based approach and strong safety culture seeks to introduce safety controls before incidents occur.

Radiation Protection

Radiation risks are effectively managed at Cigar Lake through a formal radiation protection program and dedicated personnel who ensure that doses to workers are as low as reasonably achievable. The program ensures that radiation protection is considered in the physical design of all facilities and operating procedures. It also provides for systematic monitoring of radiation in work areas and tracking the exposures of individual workers using a combination of monitoring devices and health testing. Radiation exposures at Cigar Lake are far below the regulated limits.

Environmental Protection

At Cameco, protection of the environment is one of our highest corporate priorities during all stages of our activities, from exploration through development, operations, decommissioning, and reclamation.

We monitor our performance by tracking corporate and site-specific key performance indicators, conducting environmental monitoring programs, and regularly auditing our adherence to the requirements of these programs We use the information from all of our programs to help us to identify opportunities to improve.

Environmental management system

We have a ISO 14001-certified environmental management system used across our operating sites, which is supported by a corporate Environmental Management Program that outlines the operating requirements sites must meet. Our environmental management system encourages and promotes continuous adaptation of our practices based on new information and technologies.

Environmental risk assessments

We complete environmental risk assessments to systematically identify, quantify, and to characterize the potential risks to the environment, workers, and the public. We use our environmental risk assessments to inform our decisions and actions. Additionally, we complete an iterative process, where required, to verify that our proposed measures to protect the environment and the public are effective. We review or update the assessments every five years, incorporating results from our environmental monitoring programs and other scientific advances.

Environmental performance reports

For our Saskatchewan operations, every five years we also compare monitoring data collected during the reporting period against predictions contained in approved environmental risk assessments or environmental assessments. By reviewing the data from the performance reports and conducting risks assessments, we are able to demonstrate that human health and the environment in the vicinity of our Saskatchewan operations remains protected. Results from these analyses are also used to inform changes to the environmental monitoring programs conducted at each operation.

Corrective action process

We have a corrective action process in place to systematically investigate and address the causes of non-conformance to regulatory requirements or internal standards. The process includes classifying the non-conformance, assigning the appropriate level of investigation (dependent on incident significance), and tracking the recommended corrective actions to prevent and mitigate similar occurrences.

Audits

To support our culture of continuous improvement, our processes and operations undergo regular audits, including:

  • Our environmental management system is audited by a third-party every three years as a requirement to maintain our ISO 14001 certification.
  • Our SHEQ team conducts an internal audit of our SHEQ programs on a three-year cycle. The total audit scope is split in half and executed on a rotating basis. This means that all our sites undergo at least two audits to cover all aspects of our SHEQ programs within every three-year period. The audit follows the ISO 19001 process and encompasses our environmental and safety programs.
  • We also maintain and implement an internal audit program at our corporate office. Results and recommendations from this systematic and documented process are presented to senior management, who are responsible for implementing them and correcting any deficiencies. The internal audit group reports to the audit and finance committee of the board.

Environmental Monitoring

Comprehensive monitoring programs are in place at the Cigar Lake operation to help protect the surrounding environment. Samples of water, air, soil, plants and fish are collected from numerous locations around the site and tested to confirm that environmental protection systems are effective. Monitoring results are submitted to federal and provincial regulatory authorities for review. Cameco also supports independent regional monitoring downstream of its Saskatchewan operations to ensure there are no cumulative effects on the regional watershed. The extensive monitoring undertaken at Cigar Lake has identified no significant impact on the surrounding environment.

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Arsenic

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0067 to 0.5.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Copper

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0001 to 0.3.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Lead

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0001 to 0.2.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Nickel

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0005 to 0.5.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Zinc

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0021 to 0.5.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Suspended Solids

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 1 to 15.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Radium-226

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying Bq/L. Data ranges from 0.003 to 0.37.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — pH

Chart

Line chart with 3 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying pH. Data ranges from 6 to 9.5.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Selenium

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0006 to 0.6.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Uranium

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0001 to 2.5.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Molybdenum

Chart

Line chart with 60 data points.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.0076 to 0.429.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Treated Water Quality — Un-ionized Ammonia as Nitrogen

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying mg/L. Data ranges from 0.01 to 0.5.
End of interactive chart.
 

Cigar Lake Monitoring Results
Ambient Air Quality – Annual Average Total Suspended Particulate (TSP)

Chart

Line chart with 2 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying µg/m³. Data ranges from 6 to 60.
End of interactive chart.
 

Environmental Incidents and Other Events

Environmental incidents and other events are reported to regulatory agencies as required by federal and provincial regulations.

Latest incident or event:

DateMarch 8, 2025
IncidentLost-Time Injury
DetailsWhile operating underground rock-bolting equipment, a worker suffered a crush-type injury to their hand.
Corrective ActionThe worker reported to on-site nursing staff for treatment and was flown off-site for further assessment. The incident is under investigation and has been reported to the regulators. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
Past Reporting
DateMarch 8, 2025
IncidentLost-Time Injury
DetailsWhile operating underground rock-bolting equipment, a worker suffered a crush-type injury to their hand.
Corrective ActionThe worker reported to on-site nursing staff for treatment and was flown off-site for further assessment. The incident is under investigation and has been reported to the regulators. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateFeb. 26, 2025
IncidentReportable Release
DetailsApproximately 39 cubic metres of Potentially Acid Generating (PAG) waste rock from underground were erroneously placed on an unlined stockpile designated for clean basement rock, instead of the Waste Rock Crush Pad.
Corrective ActionThe material was removed and placed on the crush pad. An investigation is underway. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateNov. 6, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsDuring routine environmental inspections, aircraft fuel was observed leaking from the sample station/pump into its secondary containment. The leak was coming from a check valve at the top of the tank.
Corrective ActionAn emergency response team was activated to attend the scene and to control any possible vapours. A millwright arrived and controlled the leak. A maintenance notification was created to prevent recurrence. The CNSC Duty officer was contacted. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateOct. 25, 2024
IncidentReportable Discharge 
DetailsA tote of MasterRoc SA 160 was punctured by a forklift, resulting in a release of approximately 50 litres onto the ground. 
Corrective ActionThe spilled product was cleaned up and will be sent offsite for proper disposal. The CNSC Duty Officer and Provincial Spill Control Centre were notified.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateSept. 13, 2024
IncidentRadiation Action Level Exceedance
DetailsA worker had an acute intake of 2.1 mSv of uranium due to a potential personal protective equipment misuse.
Corrective ActionThe worker was removed from radiation work areas and an investigation has been initiated.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateSept. 13, 2024
IncidentDangerous Occurrence
DetailsThe Shaft #2 hoist was in Auto Cage mode when the cage was called to the collar. A loader operator opened the gate and started to place a skid onto the cage. When the operator had the skid approximately halfway into the cage, the cage started to travel up to its resting spot. The operator realized it was moving and backed out quickly; a shaft crew member quickly hit the emergency-stop, which halted the cage's movement.
Corrective ActionElectricians investigated and discovered a switch was stuck in a closed position and repairs were completed. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateSept. 6-12, 2024
IncidentRadiation Action Level Exceedance
DetailsAn analysis of urine samples showed a contractor received a dose that exceeded the weekly action level of 1 mSv. 
Corrective ActionThe worker was removed from radiation work areas and the abnormal intake standard was implemented. Preliminary investigation suggests improper removal of PPE contributed to the event. Investigation is ongoing.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateAugust 20, 2024
IncidentDangerous Occurrence
DetailsA loaded scoop was proceeding up a ramp from the 500L. Approximately 12 m up the ramp, the scoop slid back down and contacted a power take-off (PTO) panel located approximately 3.5m up the ramp. Upon investigation by qualified personnel, it was determined that the bottom left corner of the PTO panel exterior was damaged, but the integrity of the outer case was intact. The cable to the PTO had not been contacted in any way, the equipment operator was unharmed, and the scoop had no visible damage. This event is considered a dangerous occurrence in The Mines Regulations, 2018, based on the loss of control of the vehicle conveying workers.
Corrective ActionThe area was roped off, the PTO panel was locked out and all equipment involved were assessed for damages. The PTO panel was then removed and a notification was entered to have the PTO replaced and installed in a better location. A review of all PTO locations underground will be performed and the ones that are deemed to be in the line of fire of mobile equipment will be relocated. Furthermore, the ramp was chipped and will be shotcreted to increase traction. An investigation in conjunction with the Occupational Health Committee will be completed.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateAugust 4, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA fire alarm at the 480 Level control room bathroom underground was activated at 6:08 p.m. There was no sign of smoke or fire underground. The smoke detector had been set off by a controlled mining blast. 
Corrective ActionN/A
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateJuly 11, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA fire alarm in the underground (UG) fuel bay was activated at 09:51 pm.
Corrective ActionAll UG personnel reported to the refuge stations and were accounted for by incident command. MRT responded to the UG fuel bay, swept the mine, and confirmed there was no smoke or fire. The fire alarm panel was reset, stench gas cartridges replaced and the MRT stood down. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateJuly 2, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA fire alarm at the Shaft #2 Mine Air Exhaust Building was activated at 05:17 p.m. The ERT responded and confirmed there was no fire. The fire alarm panel was reset and the ERT stood down. The alarm was triggered by dust from concrete dust clean-up activities making its way through the vents.
Corrective ActionN/A
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateJuly 3, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA fire, caused by a lighting storm and dry forest conditions, was observed by site personnel and safety team on the lease between the site guard shack and gravel pit. The site ERT team deployed to find the location and the status of the fire. Upon locating the fire, the team worked to prevent it from spreading and impacting the site, using water packs and hand tools. SPSA Stony Rapids deployed a helicopter to site to confirm the location and control of the fire, then landed and confirmed the fire to be under control. The safety team will continue to monitor the area. 
Corrective ActionN/A
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateJune 27, 2024
IncidentLost-Time Injury
DetailsOn Dec. 23, a worker injured their right bicep while attempting to remove a seized pin. On Dec. 28, the worker was placed on restricted work duties. The worker continued to experience symptoms related to the injury, and after following up with offsite medical attention, was scheduled for surgery. Starting July 6, 2024, this injury will be reclassified to a lost-time injury.
Corrective ActionAn investigation was completed to determine the contributing factors to the event. It found the injury was caused by using the incorrect tool for the job.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateJune 21, 2024
IncidentDangerous Occurrence
DetailsA worker was on the second rung of a ladder when the top of the ladder came loose and shifted backward. The worker stepped off the ladder and was not injured. Investigation determined the wedge that secured the clamp at the top of the ladder had come loose and caused the clamp to open. 
Corrective ActionThe scaffolding has been repaired and inspected. Site scaffold erectors are completing inspections on the scaffolding with increased focus on similar ladder attachments.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateMay 28, 2024
Incident
Dangerous Occurrence
DetailsA cage operator opened the door to signal to the hoist operator and then proceeded out of the cage. When signaling to release the cage after closing the door, a rock fell from above and landed beside the cage operator. The operator was not injured, however, there was the potential for a more serious outcome had they been contacted by the rock.
Corrective ActionThe headframe was inspected for any other rocks on the beams. The shaft was also inspected. An investigation in conjunction with the site Occupational Health and Safety Committee will be conducted.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateMay 24, 2024
Incident
Reportable Discharge
DetailsA compressor for the process water cooling loop was observed not running. Upon further investigation, the condenser had lost its entire 310-pound charge of R134A refrigerant.
Corrective ActionEquipment is not operating at this time; investigation into the cause of the leak and possible repairs will be completed.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateMay 17, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA fire alarm at the administration building was activated at 08:43 pm on May 16, 2024.
Corrective ActionThe ERT responded to the firehall and was put on standby while the field coordinator assessed the situation. This was a witnessed event and it was confirmed that dust from sweeping activities set off the alarm. The alarm panel was reset and the ERT stood down.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateMarch 4, 2024
IncidentEnvironmental Action Level Exceedance
DetailsOn March 4, 2024, a treated effluent pond was released to the environment that was above the action level for molybdenum of 1.1 mg/L as stated in the environmental code of practice in the Cigar Lake Environment Management Program. The result from the external laboratory for the pond was 1.36 mg/L. The pond fill sample result from the Cigar Lake laboratory for the pond was 0.06 mg/L on March 3, 2024
Corrective ActionAn additional sample collected on March 4, 2024 was sent to the external laboratory for re-analysis. An investigation is underway to determine the cause of the event.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateMarch 2, 2024
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA worker tripped on some equipment in the Shaft 2 Headframe. The emergency response team stabilized the situation and transported the worker to the health centre, where the worker was provided first aid treatment. The worker returned to full duties the following day.
Corrective ActionThe event has been investigated, and corrective actions have been put in place. The event has been reported to the CNSC.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateNovember 19, 2023
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA worker slipped and fell when exiting an administrative building. The Emergency Response Team transported the worker to the health centre. Further medical treatment will be pursued offsite.
Corrective ActionPrior to the incident, the site received freezing rain. Although the area was sanded extensively, ice remained on the metal grating of the stairs. The worker was using traction aids at the time of the incident.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateNovember 13, 2023
IncidentRadiation Action Level Exceedance
DetailsAn underground worker who spent 25 days on site during the third quarter had an average weekly effective dose of 1.31 mSv, exceeding the weekly action level of the Radiation Code of Practice.
Corrective ActionThe incident is being investigated through interviews and reviews of the worker’s tasks and activities. The incident has been reported to the CNSC.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateSeptember 25, 2023
IncidentDangerous Occurrence
DetailsThe pressure on a tunnel backfill bulkhead increased unexpectedly. The tunnel backfill pour was halted. A short time later, the pressure decreased. Upon visual inspection of the bulkhead, a support timber was observed to have cracked. Personnel in the immediate area were directed to exit the area and barricade all entrances to it. All non-essential personnel were brought to surface as a precaution pending further assessment.
Corrective ActionUsing a drone for a remote visual inspection, an engineer determined the bulkhead is not at risk of imminent failure. The area will remain roped off as further inspections and assessments are completed. Normal operations at Cigar Lake resumed that evening. The incident was reported to the regulatory agencies.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateSeptember 23, 2023
IncidentReportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsThe nightshift operator noticed a 3% drop in each of the hot and cold tanks of the brine distribution system. After evaluating the data, it was determined that a leak began that evening. Following a search of the system, the leak was located on the northwest corner of the west freeze pad where a bleed valve was in a partially opened position. The leak was stopped with approximately 6 m3 of calcium chloride brine having leaked to the ground.
Corrective ActionThe supply and return flows were isolated to the freeze hole and the spilled brine was cleaned up. An investigation is underway. The incident has been reported to the CNSC.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateSeptember 18, 2023
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the Duty Officer
DetailsA worker rolled their left ankle while transitioning from a concrete floor to metal tread plate in the Ore Loadout building. The emergency response team transported the worker to the health centre for assessment and treatment. The worker has since returned to work.
Corrective ActionThere is an approximately one-inch difference in elevation between the two floor surfaces. Paint on the floor had faded, reducing the visibility of the transition. Fresh paint is recommended to prevent recurrence. An investigation is underway, and the incident has been reported to the CNSC.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateSeptember 15, 2023
IncidentReportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsThree totes of sand/rock from Ore Load Out Building were placed in the domestic waste landfill. One tote was broken, and all three totes were observed to have sand/rock spilled around them. A radiation scan confirmed that the sand/rock represented a recordable radiological release.
Corrective ActionThe site was assessed by Radiation & Environment. Site Services cleaned up the sand/rock material and disposed of it onto Stockpile B. The incident has been reported to the CNSC, and is under investigation.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateSeptember 11, 2023
IncidentRadiation Action Level Exceedance
DetailsAfter a worker completed thickness testing of the two wash receiver vessels in slurry loadout, a sample of the long-lived radioactive dust (LLRD) came back at levels elevated above normal. A follow-up urine sampling with the worker indicated an intake that exceeded the quarterly action level of 5 mSv.
Corrective ActionFurther sampling was completed to finalize the estimated dose. The worker has been restricted from all high radiation work to ensure they do not exceed 20 mSv Cameco limit per year. The incident was reported to the CNSC, and an investigation is underway
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateAugust 30, 2023
IncidentReportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsA nitrogen pressure regulator malfunctioned in the process water cooling loop, resulting in a release of nitrogen gas to the atmosphere. It is estimated that one full bottle (13 m3) of nitrogen was released before the leak was detected. The process water cooling loop was shut down and the nitrogen shut off.
Corrective ActionNitrogen pressure regulator malfunctioned. The cause of the failure is under investigation. The regulator was disassembled, and internal parts ordered for repair.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateAugust 26, 2023
IncidentRadiation Action Level Exceedance
DetailsDuring routine review of OSLD dosimetry results, the result for a contractor was reported as 4.1 mSv for between April 1 – June 30, 2023 (Q2). After reviewing the worker’s time onsite in the quarter, it has been determined that the exposure potentially meets the criteria of a weekly action level exceedance of greater than 1 mSv in a seven-day period. As the worker’s quarterly effective dose is less than 5 mSv, there is no exceedance of the quarterly action level limit in this case.
Corrective ActionAn investigation into the cause of the event was initiated, including interviews and a review of worker activities for the time period in question.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateAugust 5, 2023
IncidentReportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsIn Freeze Plant #1, a worker performed maintenance repair on the auto purge from the ammonia system then put it back into service. After a few hours of operation, a malfunction on the solenoid valve occurred causing the water bubbler vessel to become filled with 5-10 lbs of ammonia. This vessel is designed to hold water and catch ammonia gases from the ammonia system. Due to the solenoid valve failing, the ammonia collected in the vessel and an unknown amount leaked into the atmosphere inside the building, causing an ammonia detector alarm to be activated.
Corrective ActionIt was determined the solenoid valve malfunctioned due to numerous plunger screws being loose, presumably from vibration. The auto purge was shut down and isolated from the system until corrective actions are taken.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateJuly 22, 2023
IncidentReportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsBetween July 21 at 10:40 a.m. and July 22 at 7:50 p.m., the level indicators for Pond B (treated effluent monitoring pond) dropped approximately 1.1%. It was determined that approximately 80 m3 of treated water was released through the pond liner into the environment. The treated water met all effluent quality limits. On July 23, during pond liner cleaning and inspection, the operator identified seven small holes in the liner within Pond B. Damage was likely caused by ice over the winter.
Corrective ActionAn external contractor repaired the liner on July 24.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateJuly 18, 2023
IncidentEmergency Transport to External Medical Facilities
DetailsAn employee was on a transmixer checking equipment in the 480 Level underground. When the employee stepped off the transmixer, their right ankle rolled, causing them to twist their knee and fall over. Co-workers brought the employee to the health center, and they subsequently received medical transport to an external medical facility.
Corrective ActionThe incident is under investigation.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateJuly 5, 2023
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the CNSC Duty Officer
Details At 07:31 am, smoke was observed coming from the top of the Shaft #2 exhaust fan and smoke alarms were triggered. 
Corrective Action

 All underground personnel mustered in refuge stations. ERT responded, awaiting confirmation that power was disconnected before entering. The smoke was later confirmed to be coming from a variable speed drive within the MCC room. ERT did not find any smoke, fire or obvious scorching in the area and, once it was confirmed safe, underground personnel were released from refuge stations.

No one was injured and investigation into the probable cause is ongoing. The CNSC was notified.

Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateJune 21, 2023
IncidentReportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsDuring an environmental inspection of Stockpile C, a tear in the liner was identified. It is believed the tear occurred during the erosion gully repair work on the southeast berm on April 11, 2023. The tear is high up on the liner and no water is currently flowing into the area. This tear was not previously identified during routine inspections because there was a layer of sediment covering it, but recent rains exposed the tear. 
Corrective ActionThere was no water flowing into the area when the tear was identified. A plan is being developed to have the liner repaired in a timely manner.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateApril 11, 2023
Incident Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsWhile conducting erosion repairs on the southeast berm of Stockpile C on April 11, the HDPE liner was punctured. An estimated 1,000-2,000 L of meltwater in contact with potentially acid generating waste rock was released.
Corrective ActionA berm was created within the Stockpile C containment ditch and water is being pumped around the damaged liner section to mitigate meltwater entering the environment. A third-party contractor has been hired to repair the damaged section of the HDPE liner.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateApril 11, 2023
Incident Reportable Spill, Discharge, Discovery or Release
DetailsDuring routine inspections on April 11, Cameco identified erosion gullies on the southeast berm of Stockpile C (which contains Potential Acid Generating wasterock). An estimated 10,000 L of meltwater from Stockpile C was released from the containment ditch surrounding the waste rock pile.
Corrective ActionThe site services department was contacted immediately. Material from Stockpile A (clean waste rock pile) was used to reinforce the southeast berm and ensure the meltwater stayed within the containment ditch.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnegligible impact2
DateJanuary 23, 2023
IncidentReportable incident
DetailsAt the ore loadout, an operator noticed a hole in the discharge spool. Approximately 300 L of ore slurry material was released to secondary containment within the ore loadout building basement.
Corrective ActionIt is believed a worn spool caused the slurry release. The pump was shut down upon discovery and the area was cleaned up. The line will be repaired.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateNovember 19, 2022
IncidentReportable incident
DetailsWhile probing in a hole at the west freeze pad, the instrument snagged at the 173 m mark from the surface. Increasing tension on the winching system caused the cable to snap, resulting in the instrument falling to the hole bottom at about 455 m depth. The instrument contains a 111 GBq Am/Be source required for its operation.
Corrective ActionEfforts to retrieve the instrument began immediately. The depth that the instrument snagged corresponds to a section where directional drilling was used to alter its course. This may have resulted in the pipe slightly opening or bulging, creating a lip that caught the instrument.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateOctober 28, 2022
IncidentOperational Limit Exceedance - Order under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act
DetailsAn inspection by CNSC personnel determined that the current operating volume of Stockpile C – a safe storage site for potentially reactive waste rock from underground development work – exceeded its volume limit specified in the Waste Management Program.
Corrective ActionThe CNSC issued an order, which Cameco is working to address. Cameco has ceased all additions to the stockpile.  Further, a third-party expert has been to site and is confirming whether the materials are stable as currently deposited. There is no risk to the environment, public health, or safety. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingno measurable impact to the environment1
DateOctober 17, 2022
IncidentReportable Release
DetailsDuring inspection, an area was identified along the ramp leading into Stockpile B with elevated radiological readings upwards of 5-13 uSv/hr. The radiation department conducted a grid scan and confirmed a small area with higher radiological readings. Site Services removed the top layer of material, after which radiological readings were higher. During further scraping of the area, Site Services found a greyish material, which had radiological readings between 50-100 uSv/hr and is believed to be uranium ore.
Corrective ActionThe radiologically contaminated material was removed and placed on Stockpile B, which is designated for contaminated material. It was mixed with clean fill during the clean-up process. A subsequent grid scan confirmed the affected area went down to 0.8 uSv/hr. 
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnegligible impact2
DateOctober 1, 2022
IncidentReportable Spill
DetailsWhile the freeze plants were down due to routine site maintenance, the operator noticed the smell of ammonia by the condenser. The cause is believed to be from a small pin-hole leak within the condenser coil bundles. Ammonia level indicators in the area have remained unchanged, indicating that the release volume is likely negligible.
Corrective ActionThe condenser was pumped down and isolated. The location of the leak is being investigated.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnegligible impact2
DateJuly 9, 2022
IncidentEvent Requiring Reporting to the CNSC Duty Officer
DetailsAn emergency page was issued at 3:48 a.m. on July 9, for an injured worker at a surface freeze drill rig. The individual was struck with a pipe approximately 0.4 m in length after it fell from a height of approximately 1.5 m.
Corrective ActionThe individual was taken to the health centre where they were met by the ERT and the occupational health nurse. An investigation, in conjunction with the OHC, will be carried out.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A
DateMay 27, 2022
IncidentRadiation Action Level Exceedance
DetailsDuring routine review of PAD dosimetry results, the result for a JBS operator indicated a radon progeny exposure of 1.27 mSv. After reviewing the worker’s time onsite in the month of March, it was determined that the exposure met the criteria of a weekly action level exceedance of greater than 1 mSv in a seven day period.
Corrective ActionAn investigation into the cause of the event was initiated, including interviews and a review of worker activities for the time period in question.
Cameco Environmental Effect Ratingnot applicableN/A

Cameco Environmental Effect Rating

  • Level 1 - no measurable impact to the environment
  • Level 2 - negligible impact
  • Level 3 - short-term, seasonal impact
  • Level 4 - mortality of some species, but not affecting ecosystem function
  • Level 5 - impairment of ecosystem function
  • N/A - not applicable 

Decommissioning

Detailed plans and financial guarantees are in place to provide for decommissioning of the Cigar Lake sites when operations end. Decommissioning will include removal of all buildings and equipment and landscaping and re-vegetation of disturbed areas. All underground workings and other mine facilities will be sealed off and secured. A monitoring program will be in place to ensure the sites remain in a secure and stable state for the long-term. For more information, see Preliminary Decommissioning Plan - Summary - Cigar Lake Operation.

Waste Management

Ore mined at Cigar Lake is milled at Orano's McClean Lake operation. There is no tailings management facility at the Cigar Lake site. The jet boring mining method employed at Cigar Lake generates less waste rock than other methods. The waste rock that is brought to the surface is stored on lined pads. Waste rock containing small amounts of uranium is transported to the McClean Lake mill where it is used to blend down the high-grade ore prior to milling.

Environmental Risk Assessment

All new, or substantially changed, mining developments may be subject to environmental risk assessments (ERAs) to identify potential effects on the environment. ERAs follow guidance provided by CSA and various agencies, such as Health Canada (HC), Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC).

In 2021, Cameco completed an environmental risk assessment (ERA) in accordance with the standardized requirements found in CSA N288.6-12 Environmental Risk Assessments at Class I Nuclear Facilities and Uranium Mines and Mills.

Public Summary - Environmental Risk Assessment - Cigar Lake Operation (PDF 1.4 MB)

Regulatory Oversight

The primary regulator for the Cigar Lake operation is the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). The mine is also subject to regulatory oversight from several other federal and provincial agencies including Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment. Federal and provincial regulators conduct regular site inspections and audits to verify that people and the environment are protected. Uranium mining and milling operations in Canada are licensed by the CNSC.

Image
Environment, governance, social image

Sustainability at Cameco

When measuring the sustainability and ethical impact of a company, environmental, social and governance (ESG) are key factors considered by the public and investors. Sustainability and ESG matters have been an important focus at Cameco for many years and we have a strong performance record.

Learn more